Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18281#discussion_r122007474
  
    --- Diff: 
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/OneVsRest.scala ---
    @@ -325,8 +350,13 @@ final class OneVsRest @Since("1.4.0") (
           multiclassLabeled.persist(StorageLevel.MEMORY_AND_DISK)
         }
     
    +    val iters = Range(0, numClasses).par
    +    iters.tasksupport = new ForkJoinTaskSupport(
    +      new ForkJoinPool(Math.min(getParallelism, numClasses))
    --- End diff --
    
    I don't think `ForkJoinPool` is the best thing to use here.  It's more 
geared for a bunch of small tasks that might spawn other tasks.  Just a regular 
thread-pool is fine.  Also, it is a little better for the case of `parallelism` 
1 to use `sameThreadExecutor`.  This will just run in the current thread and 
has no overhead (equivalent to running in serial), where a thread-pool of size 
1 will still create another thread and does have some overhead.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to