Github user bdrillard commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18075#discussion_r122017129
  
    --- Diff: 
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/GeneratedProjectionSuite.scala
 ---
    @@ -83,6 +83,58 @@ class GeneratedProjectionSuite extends SparkFunSuite {
         assert(result === row2)
       }
     
    +  test("SPARK-18016: generated projections on wider table requiring 
class-splitting") {
    +    val N = 4000
    +    val wideRow1 = new GenericInternalRow((1 to N).toArray[Any])
    +    val schema1 = StructType((1 to N).map(i => StructField("", 
IntegerType)))
    +    val wideRow2 = new GenericInternalRow(
    +      (1 to N).map(i => UTF8String.fromString(i.toString)).toArray[Any])
    +    val schema2 = StructType((1 to N).map(i => StructField("", 
StringType)))
    +    val joined = new JoinedRow(wideRow1, wideRow2)
    +    val joinedSchema = StructType(schema1 ++ schema2)
    +    val nested = new JoinedRow(InternalRow(joined, joined), joined)
    +    val nestedSchema = StructType(
    +      Seq(StructField("", joinedSchema), StructField("", joinedSchema)) ++ 
joinedSchema)
    +
    +    // test generated UnsafeProjection
    +    val unsafeProj = UnsafeProjection.create(nestedSchema)
    +    val unsafe: UnsafeRow = unsafeProj(nested)
    +    (0 until N).foreach { i =>
    +      val s = UTF8String.fromString((i + 1).toString)
    --- End diff --
    
    Fixed. See the above comment. Creating the data with `0 until N` cleans up 
the indexing on `i`.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to