Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13599
So this certainly seems interesting, although like the linked PR it's also
a non-trivial change. By attempting to also handle the interactive case (which
certainly is important) we've got many different code paths for installing
packages.
That being said I think we need conda/virtualenv support - and 2.3 is
probably a good time for us to work on this.
Maybe we should have a conversation on the dev@ list for approaches once
2.2 is out? What do @davies / @zjffdu / @stibbons / @gatorsmile think about
this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
