Github user mbasmanova commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18421#discussion_r124448971
  
    --- Diff: 
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkSqlParserSuite.scala
 ---
    @@ -239,18 +239,20 @@ class SparkSqlParserSuite extends AnalysisTest {
           AnalyzeTableCommand(TableIdentifier("t"), noscan = false))
         assertEqual("analyze table t compute statistics noscan",
           AnalyzeTableCommand(TableIdentifier("t"), noscan = true))
    -    assertEqual("analyze table t partition (a) compute statistics nOscAn",
    +    assertEqual("analyze table t compute statistics nOscAn",
           AnalyzeTableCommand(TableIdentifier("t"), noscan = true))
     
    -    // Partitions specified - we currently parse them but don't do 
anything with it
    +    // Partitions specified
         assertEqual("ANALYZE TABLE t PARTITION(ds='2008-04-09', hr=11) COMPUTE 
STATISTICS",
    -      AnalyzeTableCommand(TableIdentifier("t"), noscan = false))
    +      AnalyzeTableCommand(TableIdentifier("t"), noscan = false,
    +        partitionSpec = Some(Map("ds" -> "2008-04-09", "hr" -> "11"))))
         assertEqual("ANALYZE TABLE t PARTITION(ds='2008-04-09', hr=11) COMPUTE 
STATISTICS noscan",
    -      AnalyzeTableCommand(TableIdentifier("t"), noscan = true))
    -    assertEqual("ANALYZE TABLE t PARTITION(ds, hr) COMPUTE STATISTICS",
    -      AnalyzeTableCommand(TableIdentifier("t"), noscan = false))
    -    assertEqual("ANALYZE TABLE t PARTITION(ds, hr) COMPUTE STATISTICS 
noscan",
    -      AnalyzeTableCommand(TableIdentifier("t"), noscan = true))
    +      AnalyzeTableCommand(TableIdentifier("t"), noscan = true,
    +        partitionSpec = Some(Map("ds" -> "2008-04-09", "hr" -> "11"))))
    +    intercept("ANALYZE TABLE t PARTITION(ds, hr) COMPUTE STATISTICS",
    --- End diff --
    
    I see. Thanks for pointing that out. Currently, this PR supports only exact 
partition spec. It doesn't support partial partition specs describing the 
document above. My preference would be to keep it simple for this PR and 
support only exact spec and add support for partial specs in a follow up PR. 
What do you think?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to