Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17862
@hhbyyh Make sense, does it mean both LBFGS and OWLQN produce the same
solution if fitting without intercept? If so, I'm prefer to change the solver
to LBFGS rather than adding a new option. Since we treat LBFGS and OWLQN as the
same solver in other algorithms like ```LinearRegression``` and
```LogisticRegression```.
BTW, we can discuss whether we should follow the same way(compared with
sklearn/R) to handle intercept in follow-up work. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
