Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18624#discussion_r127641479
  
    --- Diff: 
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/recommendation/MatrixFactorizationModel.scala
 ---
    @@ -286,40 +288,120 @@ object MatrixFactorizationModel extends 
Loader[MatrixFactorizationModel] {
           srcFeatures: RDD[(Int, Array[Double])],
           dstFeatures: RDD[(Int, Array[Double])],
           num: Int): RDD[(Int, Array[(Int, Double)])] = {
    -    val srcBlocks = blockify(srcFeatures)
    -    val dstBlocks = blockify(dstFeatures)
    -    val ratings = srcBlocks.cartesian(dstBlocks).flatMap { case (srcIter, 
dstIter) =>
    -      val m = srcIter.size
    -      val n = math.min(dstIter.size, num)
    -      val output = new Array[(Int, (Int, Double))](m * n)
    +    val srcBlocks = blockify(rank, srcFeatures).zipWithIndex()
    +    val dstBlocks = blockify(rank, dstFeatures)
    +    val ratings = srcBlocks.cartesian(dstBlocks).map {
    +      case (((srcIds, srcFactors), index), (dstIds, dstFactors)) =>
    +        val m = srcIds.length
    +        val n = dstIds.length
    +        val dstIdMatrix = new Array[Int](m * num)
    +        val scoreMatrix = Array.fill[Double](m * 
num)(Double.NegativeInfinity)
    +        val pq = new BoundedPriorityQueue[(Int, 
Double)](num)(Ordering.by(_._2))
    +
    +        val ratings = srcFactors.transpose.multiply(dstFactors)
    +        var i = 0
    +        var j = 0
    +        while (i < m) {
    +          var k = 0
    +          while (k < n) {
    +            pq += dstIds(k) -> ratings(i, k)
    +            k += 1
    +          }
    +          var size = pq.size
    +          while (size > 0) {
    +            size -= 1
    +            val factor = pq.poll()
    --- End diff --
    
    The queue is length `num` - which is typically`10`, `20`, or perhaps in 
extreme cases in the low `100`'s. So is there really any performance benefit 
here? Even if so it would be marginal and I believe it's cleaner do just use 
`foreach` and `sorted`, and not worth adding the `poll` method.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to