Github user eyalfa commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18855
Funny enough, that's the approach I've chosen.
On Aug 15, 2017 19:17, "Marcelo Vanzin" <[email protected]> wrote:
> *@vanzin* commented on this pull request.
> ------------------------------
>
> In core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManagerSuite.scala
> <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18855#discussion_r133232857>:
>
> > @@ -1415,6 +1415,79 @@ class BlockManagerSuite extends SparkFunSuite
with Matchers with BeforeAndAfterE
> super.fetchBlockSync(host, port, execId, blockId)
> }
> }
> +
> + def testGetOrElseUpdateForLargeBlock(storageLevel: StorageLevel) {
>
> It would be probably easier to propagate the chunk size as a SparkConf
> entry that is not documented. But up to you guys.
>
> â
> You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18855#discussion_r133232857>, or
mute
> the thread
>
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABFFOZXLge3svlsrRWDJnt_xImYb6cTjks5sYcSVgaJpZM4OukZQ>
> .
>
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
