Github user rdblue commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19269#discussion_r141460252
  
    --- Diff: 
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/v2/writer/DataSourceV2Writer.java
 ---
    @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
    +/*
    + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
    + * contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file distributed with
    + * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
    + * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
    + * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
    + * the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
    + *
    + *    http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
    + *
    + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
    + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
    + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
    + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
    + * limitations under the License.
    + */
    +
    +package org.apache.spark.sql.sources.v2.writer;
    +
    +import org.apache.spark.annotation.InterfaceStability;
    +import org.apache.spark.sql.Row;
    +import org.apache.spark.sql.SaveMode;
    +import org.apache.spark.sql.sources.v2.DataSourceV2Options;
    +import org.apache.spark.sql.sources.v2.WriteSupport;
    +import org.apache.spark.sql.types.StructType;
    +
    +/**
    + * A data source writer that is returned by
    + * {@link WriteSupport#createWriter(StructType, SaveMode, 
DataSourceV2Options)}.
    + * It can mix in various writing optimization interfaces to speed up the 
data saving. The actual
    + * writing logic is delegated to {@link DataWriter}.
    + *
    + * The writing procedure is:
    + *   1. Create a writer factory by {@link #createWriterFactory()}, 
serialize and send it to all the
    + *      partitions of the input data(RDD).
    + *   2. For each partition, create the data writer, and write the data of 
the partition with this
    + *      writer. If all the data are written successfully, call {@link 
DataWriter#commit()}. If
    + *      exception happens during the writing, call {@link 
DataWriter#abort()}. This step may repeat
    + *      several times as Spark will retry failed tasks.
    + *   3. If all writers are successfully committed, call {@link 
#commit(WriterCommitMessage[])}. If
    + *      some writers are aborted, or the job failed with an unknown 
reason, call {@link #abort()}.
    + *
    + * Spark may launch speculative tasks in step 2, so there may be more than 
one data writer working
    + * simultaneously for the same partition. Implementations should handle 
this case correctly, e.g.,
    + * make sure only one data writer can commit successfully, or only admit 
one committed data writer
    + * and ignore/revert others at job level.
    + *
    + * Note that, data sources are responsible for providing transaction 
ability by implementing the
    + * `commit` and `abort` methods of {@link DataSourceV2Writer} and {@link 
DataWriter} correctly.
    + * The transaction here is Spark-level transaction, which may not be the 
underlying storage
    + * transaction. For example, Spark successfully write data to a Cassandra 
data source, but
    + * Cassandra may need some more time to reach consistency at storage level.
    + */
    [email protected]
    +public interface DataSourceV2Writer {
    +
    +  /**
    +   * Creates a writer factory which will be serialized and sent to 
executors.
    +   */
    +  DataWriteFactory<Row> createWriterFactory();
    +
    +  /**
    +   * Commits this writing job with a list of commit messages. The commit 
messages are collected from
    +   * all data writers and are produced by {@link DataWriter#commit()}.
    +   *
    +   * Note that, one partition may have multiple committed data writers 
because of speculative tasks.
    +   * Spark will pick the first successful one and get its commit message. 
Implementations should be
    +   * aware of this and handle it correctly, e.g., have a mechanism to make 
sure only one data writer
    +   * can commit successfully, or have a way to clean up the data of 
already committed writers.
    +   */
    +  void commit(WriterCommitMessage[] messages);
    +
    +  /**
    +   * Aborts this writing job because some data writers are failed to write 
the records and aborted,
    +   * or the Spark job failed with some unknown reasons.
    +   *
    +   * Note that some data writer may already be committed in this case, 
implementations should be
    +   * aware of this and clean up the data.
    +   */
    +  void abort();
    --- End diff --
    
    This still needs to be passed the WriterCommitMessages for committed tasks. 
(My previous comment is gone now)


---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to