Github user aokolnychyi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18692#discussion_r144722742
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/joins.scala
---
@@ -152,3 +152,71 @@ object EliminateOuterJoin extends Rule[LogicalPlan]
with PredicateHelper {
if (j.joinType == newJoinType) f else Filter(condition,
j.copy(joinType = newJoinType))
}
}
+
+/**
+ * A rule that uses propagated constraints to infer join conditions. The
optimization is applicable
+ * only to CROSS joins.
+ *
+ * For instance, if there is a CROSS join, where the left relation has 'a
= 1' and the right
+ * relation has 'b = 1', then the rule infers 'a = b' as a join predicate.
+ */
+object InferJoinConditionsFromConstraints extends Rule[LogicalPlan] with
PredicateHelper {
+
+ def apply(plan: LogicalPlan): LogicalPlan = {
+ if (SQLConf.get.constraintPropagationEnabled) {
+ inferJoinConditions(plan)
+ } else {
+ plan
+ }
+ }
+
+ private def inferJoinConditions(plan: LogicalPlan): LogicalPlan = plan
transform {
+ case join @ Join(left, right, Cross, conditionOpt) =>
+ val leftConstraints =
join.constraints.filter(_.references.subsetOf(left.outputSet))
+ val rightConstraints =
join.constraints.filter(_.references.subsetOf(right.outputSet))
--- End diff --
@gengliangwang Yeah, makes sense. So, ``PushPredicateThroughJoin`` would
push the where clause into the join and the proposed rule will infer ``t1.col1
= t2.col1`` and change the join type to INNER. As a result, the final join
condition will be ``t1.col1 = t2.col1 and t1.col1 >= t2.col1 and (t1.col1 =
t1.col2 + t2.col2 and t2.col1 = t1.col2 + t2.col2)``. Am I right?
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
