Github user MrBago commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19746#discussion_r152111084
  
    --- Diff: 
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/VectorSizeHintSuite.scala ---
    @@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
    +/*
    + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
    + * contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file distributed with
    + * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
    + * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
    + * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
    + * the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
    + *
    + *    http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
    + *
    + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
    + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
    + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
    + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
    + * limitations under the License.
    + */
    +
    +package org.apache.spark.ml.feature
    +
    +import org.apache.spark.{SparkException, SparkFunSuite}
    +import org.apache.spark.ml.attribute.AttributeGroup
    +import org.apache.spark.ml.linalg.{Vector, Vectors}
    +import org.apache.spark.ml.util.DefaultReadWriteTest
    +import org.apache.spark.mllib.util.MLlibTestSparkContext
    +import org.apache.spark.sql.Row
    +import org.apache.spark.sql.execution.streaming.MemoryStream
    +import org.apache.spark.sql.streaming.StreamTest
    +
    +class VectorSizeHintSuite
    +  extends SparkFunSuite with MLlibTestSparkContext with 
DefaultReadWriteTest {
    +
    +  import testImplicits._
    +
    +  test("Test Param Validators") {
    +    assertThrows[IllegalArgumentException] (new 
VectorSizeHint().setHandleInvalid("invalidValue"))
    +    assertThrows[IllegalArgumentException] (new 
VectorSizeHint().setSize(-3))
    +  }
    +
    +  test("Adding size to column of vectors.") {
    +
    +    val size = 3
    +    val denseVector = Vectors.dense(1, 2, 3)
    +    val sparseVector = Vectors.sparse(size, Array(), Array())
    +
    +    val data = Seq(denseVector, denseVector, 
sparseVector).map(Tuple1.apply)
    +    val dataFrame = data.toDF("vector")
    +
    +    val transformer = new VectorSizeHint()
    +      .setInputCol("vector")
    +      .setSize(3)
    +      .setHandleInvalid("error")
    +    val withSize = transformer.transform(dataFrame)
    +    assert(
    +      AttributeGroup.fromStructField(withSize.schema("vector")).size == 
size,
    +      "Transformer did not add expected size data.")
    +  }
    +
    +  test("Size hint preserves attributes.") {
    +
    +    case class Foo(x: Double, y: Double, z: Double)
    +    val size = 3
    +    val data = Seq((1, 2, 3), (2, 3, 3))
    +    val boo = data.toDF("x", "y", "z")
    +
    +    val assembler = new VectorAssembler()
    +      .setInputCols(Array("x", "y", "z"))
    +      .setOutputCol("vector")
    +    val dataFrameWithMeatadata = assembler.transform(boo)
    +    val group = 
AttributeGroup.fromStructField(dataFrameWithMeatadata.schema("vector"))
    +
    +    val transformer = new VectorSizeHint()
    +      .setInputCol("vector")
    +      .setSize(3)
    +      .setHandleInvalid("error")
    +    val withSize = transformer.transform(dataFrameWithMeatadata)
    +
    +    val newGroup = 
AttributeGroup.fromStructField(withSize.schema("vector"))
    +    assert(newGroup.size == size, "Transformer did not add expected size 
data.")
    +    assert(
    +      newGroup.attributes.get.deep === group.attributes.get.deep,
    +      "SizeHintTransformer did not preserve attributes.")
    +  }
    +
    +  test("Handle invalid does the right thing.") {
    --- End diff --
    
    I talked offline to @jkbradley and I think it's better to throw an 
exception unless if the column includes metadata & the there is a mismatch 
between the new and original size.
    
    I've added a new test for this exception and made sure the other tests are 
run with all `handleInvalid` cases. Does it look ok now?


---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to