Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19821#discussion_r153262121
  
    --- Diff: 
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
 ---
    @@ -785,13 +785,36 @@ class CodegenContext {
        * @param expressions the codes to evaluate expressions.
        */
       def splitExpressions(row: String, expressions: Seq[String]): String = {
    -    if (row == null || currentVars != null) {
    +    if (INPUT_ROW == null || currentVars != null) {
           // Cannot split these expressions because they are not created from 
a row object.
           return expressions.mkString("\n")
         }
         splitExpressions(expressions, funcName = "apply", arguments = 
("InternalRow", row) :: Nil)
       }
     
    +  /**
    +   * Splits the generated code of expressions into multiple functions, 
because function has
    +   * 64kb code size limit in JVM. This version takes care of INPUT_ROW and 
currentVars
    +   *
    +   * @param expressions the codes to evaluate expressions.
    +   * @param funcName the split function name base.
    +   * @param argumentsExceptRow the list of (type, name) of the arguments 
of the split function
    +   *                           except for ctx.INPUT_ROW
    +  */
    +  def splitExpressions(
    +      expressions: Seq[String],
    +      funcName: String,
    +      argumentsExceptRow: Seq[(String, String)]): String = {
    --- End diff --
    
    I confirmed there are some cases that do not require to check `INPUT_ROW` 
and `currentVars`.
    - access fields in struct
    - `UnsafeJoiner`
    - comparison for ordering
    
    I will try to merge cases `1` and `2`. If a different name is required, I 
will use `splitExpressionsOnInputRow`.



---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to