GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2787
SPARK-1307 [DOCS] Don't use term 'standalone' to refer to a Spark
Application
HT to Diana, just proposing an implementation of her suggestion, which I
rather agreed with. Is there a second/third for the motion?
Refer to "self-contained" rather than "standalone" apps to avoid confusion
with standalone deployment mode. And fix placement of reference to this in
MLlib docs.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/srowen/spark SPARK-1307
Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2787.patch
To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:
This closes #2787
----
commit b5b82e28724f94573644a68a794ce33649ea6ea3
Author: Sean Owen <[email protected]>
Date: 2014-10-13T19:43:36Z
Refer to "self-contained" rather than "standalone" apps to avoid confusion
with standalone deployment mode. And fix placement of reference to this in
MLlib docs.
----
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
