Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20151
@holdenk, @rxin, @joshrosen and @ueshin, as you all might already know, I
am working on Python coverage. Based on the top of this PR, I think we can
leave the main codes intact while we properly track the coverage within worker
processes. I believe this also partly covers SPARK-20368 too.
What do you guys think about this configuration?
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
