Github user squito commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20645
  
    I agree it would be nicer to have this be a more general feature.  I would 
prefer an approach which didn't require a different configuration name, just as 
its more to document & for users to keep track of.  An alternative would be to 
have another syntax for appending to an options, perhaps ++= like scala , eg. 
"--conf spark.executor.extraJavaOptions++=..."
    
    You'd still need to tag the ConfigBuilder with what separator to use to 
merge the values together.


---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to