Github user mgaido91 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21028#discussion_r184741553
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/collectionOperations.scala
---
@@ -19,14 +19,41 @@ package org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions
import java.util.Comparator
import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.InternalRow
-import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.TypeCheckResult
+import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.{TypeCheckResult,
TypeCoercion}
import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.codegen._
import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.util.{ArrayData, GenericArrayData,
MapData, TypeUtils}
import org.apache.spark.sql.types._
import org.apache.spark.unsafe.Platform
import org.apache.spark.unsafe.array.ByteArrayMethods
import org.apache.spark.unsafe.types.{ByteArray, UTF8String}
+/**
+ * Base trait for [[BinaryExpression]]s with two arrays of the same
element type and implicit
+ * casting.
+ */
+trait BinaryArrayExpressionWithImplicitCast extends BinaryExpression
--- End diff --
It's possible indeed. Though, as far as I know there is no use case for a
function with a different number of children, so I am not sure if it makes
sense to generalize it. @cloud-fan @kiszk @ueshin WDYT?
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
