Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21560#discussion_r196589311
  
    --- Diff: 
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/continuous/ContinuousCoalesceRDD.scala
 ---
    @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
    +/*
    + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
    + * contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file distributed with
    + * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
    + * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
    + * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
    + * the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
    + *
    + *    http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
    + *
    + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
    + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
    + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
    + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
    + * limitations under the License.
    + */
    +
    +package org.apache.spark.sql.execution.streaming.continuous
    +
    +import org.apache.spark._
    +import org.apache.spark.rdd.{CoalescedRDDPartition, RDD}
    +import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.InternalRow
    +import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.UnsafeRow
    +import org.apache.spark.sql.execution.streaming.continuous.shuffle._
    +
    +case class ContinuousCoalesceRDDPartition(index: Int) extends Partition {
    +  private[continuous] var writersInitialized: Boolean = false
    +}
    +
    +/**
    + * RDD for continuous coalescing. Asynchronously writes all partitions of 
`prev` into a local
    + * continuous shuffle, and then reads them in the task thread using 
`reader`.
    + */
    +class ContinuousCoalesceRDD(var reader: ContinuousShuffleReadRDD, var 
prev: RDD[InternalRow])
    --- End diff --
    
    They are to make it this RDD checkpointable by make this clearable. This 
raises a good point, I dont think we should make this checkpointable. Rather I 
suggest this, make these simple vals (well, just remove modifier), and in 
clearDependencies, just throw an error saying "Checkpoint this RDD is not 
supported".
    
    
    We should do this for all the continuous shuffle RDDs.


---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to