Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21733#discussion_r206725731
  
    --- Diff: 
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StatefulOperatorsHelper.scala
 ---
    @@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
    +/*
    + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
    + * contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file distributed with
    + * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
    + * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
    + * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
    + * the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
    + *
    + *    http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
    + *
    + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
    + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
    + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
    + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
    + * limitations under the License.
    + */
    +
    +package org.apache.spark.sql.execution.streaming
    +
    +import org.apache.spark.internal.Logging
    +import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.InternalRow
    +import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.{Attribute, UnsafeRow}
    +import 
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.codegen.{GenerateUnsafeProjection, 
GenerateUnsafeRowJoiner}
    +import org.apache.spark.sql.execution.streaming.state.{StateStore, 
UnsafeRowPair}
    +import org.apache.spark.sql.types.StructType
    +
    +object StatefulOperatorsHelper {
    --- End diff --
    
    I am not sure why it is inside this generically named object 
`StatefulOperatorsHelper`. Rather make it a top-level trait 
`StreamingAggregationStateManager` in the `execution.streaming.state` package 
(similar to `FlatMapGroupsWithStateExecHelper`).
    
    If you are modeling this against my state format PR for mapGroupsWithState, 
the only reason I put it in the `StateManager` class inside object` 
FlatMapGroupsWithStateExecHelper` was to avoid names like 
`FlatMapGroupsWithStateExec_StateManager`. I dont think that concern applies if 
you use the name `StreamingAggregationStateManager`.


---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to