Github user Ngone51 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22001#discussion_r209658945
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala
---
@@ -929,6 +955,28 @@ class DAGScheduler(
// HadoopRDD whose underlying HDFS files have been deleted.
finalStage = createResultStage(finalRDD, func, partitions, jobId,
callSite)
} catch {
+ case e: Exception if e.getMessage ==
+
DAGScheduler.ERROR_MESSAGE_BARRIER_REQUIRE_MORE_SLOTS_THAN_CURRENT_TOTAL_NUMBER
=>
+ logWarning("The job requires to run a barrier stage that requires
more slots than the " +
+ "total number of slots in the cluster currently.")
+ jobIdToNumTasksCheckFailures.putIfAbsent(jobId, 0)
+ val numCheckFailures = jobIdToNumTasksCheckFailures.get(jobId) + 1
--- End diff --
@kiszk IIUC, there's exactly only one thread in `eventLoop`, so, the
scenario mentioned above will not happen. And I even feel it is no need to use
`ConcurrentHashMap` for `jobIdToNumTasksCheckFailures` at all. @jiangxb1987
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
