Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22319#discussion_r214585929
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/expressions/UserDefinedFunction.scala
---
@@ -129,3 +135,11 @@ case class UserDefinedFunction protected[sql] (
}
}
}
+
+object UserDefinedFunction {
+ // This is to keep backward compatibility for this case class.
+ // TODO: revisit this case class in Spark 3.0, and narrow down the
public surface.
+ def unapply(arg: UserDefinedFunction): Option[(AnyRef, DataType,
Option[Seq[DataType]])] = {
--- End diff --
I checked locally and apparently not - looks explicit unapply here and
unapply from case class are handled as the same signature from my cursory test.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
