Github user xuanyuanking commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22326#discussion_r220433916
  
    --- Diff: 
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/joins.scala 
---
    @@ -152,3 +153,56 @@ object EliminateOuterJoin extends Rule[LogicalPlan] 
with PredicateHelper {
           if (j.joinType == newJoinType) f else Filter(condition, 
j.copy(joinType = newJoinType))
       }
     }
    +
    +/**
    + * Correctly handle PythonUDF which need access both side of join side by 
changing the new join
    + * type to Cross.
    + */
    +object HandlePythonUDFInJoinCondition extends Rule[LogicalPlan] with 
PredicateHelper {
    +  def hasPythonUDF(expression: Expression): Boolean = {
    +    expression.collectFirst { case udf: PythonUDF => udf }.isDefined
    +  }
    +
    +  override def apply(plan: LogicalPlan): LogicalPlan = plan transformUp {
    +    case j @ Join(_, _, joinType, condition)
    +      if 
condition.map(splitConjunctivePredicates).getOrElse(Nil).exists(hasPythonUDF) =>
    +      if (!joinType.isInstanceOf[InnerLike] && joinType != LeftSemi) {
    +        // The current strategy only support InnerLike and LeftSemi join 
because for other type,
    +        // it breaks SQL semantic if we run the join condition as a filter 
after join. If we pass
    +        // the plan here, it'll still get a an invalid PythonUDF 
RuntimeException with message
    +        // `requires attributes from more than one child`, we throw 
firstly here for better
    +        // readable information.
    +        throw new AnalysisException("Using PythonUDF in join condition of 
join type" +
    +          s" $joinType is not supported.")
    +      }
    +      if (SQLConf.get.crossJoinEnabled) {
    +        // if condition expression contains python udf, it will be moved 
out from
    +        // the new join conditions, and the join type will be changed to 
CrossJoin.
    +        logWarning(s"The join condition:$condition of the join plan 
contains " +
    +          "PythonUDF, it will be moved out and the join plan will be " +
    +          s"turned to cross join. This plan shows below:\n $j")
    +        val (udf, rest) =
    +          
condition.map(splitConjunctivePredicates).get.partition(hasPythonUDF)
    +        val newCondition = if (rest.isEmpty) {
    +          Option.empty
    +        } else {
    +          Some(rest.reduceLeft(And))
    +        }
    +        val newJoin = j.copy(joinType = Cross, condition = newCondition)
    +        joinType match {
    +          case _: InnerLike =>
    +            Filter(udf.reduceLeft(And), newJoin)
    +          case LeftSemi =>
    +            Project(
    --- End diff --
    
    Yes, that's right.


---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to