Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22904#discussion_r238484698
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/k8s/SparkKubernetesClientFactory.scala
---
@@ -67,8 +66,16 @@ private[spark] object SparkKubernetesClientFactory {
val dispatcher = new Dispatcher(
ThreadUtils.newDaemonCachedThreadPool("kubernetes-dispatcher"))
- // TODO [SPARK-25887] Create builder in a way that respects
configurable context
- val config = new ConfigBuilder()
+ // Allow for specifying a context used to auto-configure from the
users K8S config file
+ val kubeContext = sparkConf.get(KUBERNETES_CONTEXT).filter(c =>
StringUtils.isNotBlank(c))
+ logInfo(s"Auto-configuring K8S client using " +
+ s"${if (kubeContext.isEmpty) s"context ${kubeContext.get}" else
"current context"}" +
+ s" from users K8S config file")
+
+ // Start from an auto-configured config with the desired context
+ // Fabric 8 uses null to indicate that the users current context
should be used so if no
+ // explicit setting pass null
+ val config = new
ConfigBuilder(autoConfigure(kubeContext.getOrElse(null)))
--- End diff --
> we don't propagate the submission clients config file
We don't propagate the config *file* itself, but we do propagate all its
contents, as far as I remember. But given your explanation it should work fine,
unless there's a different config context with the same name inside the
container...
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
