srowen commented on a change in pull request #23462: [SPARK-26546][SQL] Caching
of java.time.format.DateTimeFormatter
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23462#discussion_r246017582
##########
File path:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/DateTimeFormatterHelper.scala
##########
@@ -22,10 +22,34 @@ import java.time.chrono.IsoChronology
import java.time.format.{DateTimeFormatter, DateTimeFormatterBuilder,
ResolverStyle}
import java.time.temporal.{ChronoField, TemporalAccessor, TemporalQueries}
import java.util.Locale
+import java.util.concurrent.{Callable, TimeUnit}
+
+import com.google.common.cache.CacheBuilder
+import com.google.common.util.concurrent.{ExecutionError,
UncheckedExecutionException}
trait DateTimeFormatterHelper {
+ protected def toInstantWithZoneId(temporalAccessor: TemporalAccessor,
zoneId: ZoneId): Instant = {
+ val localTime = if (temporalAccessor.query(TemporalQueries.localTime) ==
null) {
+ LocalTime.ofNanoOfDay(0)
+ } else {
+ LocalTime.from(temporalAccessor)
+ }
+ val localDate = LocalDate.from(temporalAccessor)
+ val localDateTime = LocalDateTime.of(localDate, localTime)
+ val zonedDateTime = ZonedDateTime.of(localDateTime, zoneId)
+ Instant.from(zonedDateTime)
+ }
+}
+
+object DateTimeFormatterHelper {
+ private val cache = CacheBuilder.newBuilder()
+ .initialCapacity(8)
+ .maximumSize(128)
+ .expireAfterAccess(1, TimeUnit.HOURS)
Review comment:
Agree, I think it has to make a thread to deal with it and it's not worth
it. Min size doesn't really matter either.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
With regards,
Apache Git Services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]