HeartSaVioR commented on a change in pull request #23854: [SPARK-22000][SQL] 
Address missing Upcast in JavaTypeInference.deserializerFor
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23854#discussion_r260125992
 
 

 ##########
 File path: 
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/ScalaReflection.scala
 ##########
 @@ -211,73 +167,53 @@ object ScalaReflection extends ScalaReflection {
         WrapOption(deserializerFor(optType, path, newTypePath), 
dataTypeFor(optType))
 
       case t if t <:< localTypeOf[java.lang.Integer] =>
-        val boxedType = classOf[java.lang.Integer]
-        val objectType = ObjectType(boxedType)
-        StaticInvoke(boxedType, objectType, "valueOf", path :: Nil, 
returnNullable = false)
+        createDeserializerForTypesSupportValueOf(path,
+          classOf[java.lang.Integer])
 
       case t if t <:< localTypeOf[java.lang.Long] =>
-        val boxedType = classOf[java.lang.Long]
-        val objectType = ObjectType(boxedType)
-        StaticInvoke(boxedType, objectType, "valueOf", path :: Nil, 
returnNullable = false)
+        createDeserializerForTypesSupportValueOf(path,
+          classOf[java.lang.Long])
 
       case t if t <:< localTypeOf[java.lang.Double] =>
-        val boxedType = classOf[java.lang.Double]
-        val objectType = ObjectType(boxedType)
-        StaticInvoke(boxedType, objectType, "valueOf", path :: Nil, 
returnNullable = false)
+        createDeserializerForTypesSupportValueOf(path,
+          classOf[java.lang.Double])
 
       case t if t <:< localTypeOf[java.lang.Float] =>
-        val boxedType = classOf[java.lang.Float]
-        val objectType = ObjectType(boxedType)
-        StaticInvoke(boxedType, objectType, "valueOf", path :: Nil, 
returnNullable = false)
+        createDeserializerForTypesSupportValueOf(path,
+          classOf[java.lang.Float])
 
       case t if t <:< localTypeOf[java.lang.Short] =>
-        val boxedType = classOf[java.lang.Short]
-        val objectType = ObjectType(boxedType)
-        StaticInvoke(boxedType, objectType, "valueOf", path :: Nil, 
returnNullable = false)
+        createDeserializerForTypesSupportValueOf(path,
+          classOf[java.lang.Short])
 
       case t if t <:< localTypeOf[java.lang.Byte] =>
-        val boxedType = classOf[java.lang.Byte]
-        val objectType = ObjectType(boxedType)
-        StaticInvoke(boxedType, objectType, "valueOf", path :: Nil, 
returnNullable = false)
+        createDeserializerForTypesSupportValueOf(path,
+          classOf[java.lang.Byte])
 
       case t if t <:< localTypeOf[java.lang.Boolean] =>
-        val boxedType = classOf[java.lang.Boolean]
-        val objectType = ObjectType(boxedType)
-        StaticInvoke(boxedType, objectType, "valueOf", path :: Nil, 
returnNullable = false)
+        createDeserializerForTypesSupportValueOf(path,
+          classOf[java.lang.Boolean])
 
       case t if t <:< localTypeOf[java.sql.Date] =>
-        StaticInvoke(
-          DateTimeUtils.getClass,
-          ObjectType(classOf[java.sql.Date]),
-          "toJavaDate",
-          path :: Nil,
-          returnNullable = false)
+        createDeserializerForSqlDate(path)
 
       case t if t <:< localTypeOf[java.sql.Timestamp] =>
-        StaticInvoke(
-          DateTimeUtils.getClass,
-          ObjectType(classOf[java.sql.Timestamp]),
-          "toJavaTimestamp",
-          path :: Nil,
-          returnNullable = false)
+        createDeserializerForSqlTimestamp(path)
 
       case t if t <:< localTypeOf[java.lang.String] =>
-        Invoke(path, "toString", ObjectType(classOf[String]), returnNullable = 
false)
+        createDeserializerForString(path, returnNullable = false)
 
       case t if t <:< localTypeOf[java.math.BigDecimal] =>
-        Invoke(path, "toJavaBigDecimal", 
ObjectType(classOf[java.math.BigDecimal]),
-          returnNullable = false)
+        createDeserializerForJavaBigDecimal(path, returnNullable = false)
 
 Review comment:
   Would we mind if we file a new issue which tracks the effort to investigate 
it? IMHO it looks like beyond this PR. and I'm seeing multiple PRs which keep 
adding requirements and suddenly reviewers lost interest so fail to reach 
conclusion.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


With regards,
Apache Git Services

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to