Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3780#discussion_r22278489
  
    --- Diff: 
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkStrategies.scala ---
    @@ -199,11 +199,15 @@ private[sql] abstract class SparkStrategies extends 
QueryPlanner[SparkPlan] {
       object ParquetOperations extends Strategy {
         def apply(plan: LogicalPlan): Seq[SparkPlan] = plan match {
           // TODO: need to support writing to other types of files.  Unify the 
below code paths.
    -      case logical.WriteToFile(path, child) =>
    +      case logical.WriteToFile(path, child, overwrite) =>
             val relation =
    -          ParquetRelation.create(path, child, 
sparkContext.hadoopConfiguration, sqlContext)
    -        // Note: overwrite=false because otherwise the metadata we just 
created will be deleted
    -        InsertIntoParquetTable(relation, planLater(child), overwrite = 
false) :: Nil
    +          ParquetRelation.createEmpty(
    --- End diff --
    
    It should be safe, as we believe the logical plan has been resolved already 
during the analysis phase.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to