sandeep-katta opened a new pull request #24766: [SPARK-27917][SQL] canonical 
form of CaseWhen object is incorrect
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/24766
 
 
   ## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
   
   For caseWhen Object canonicalized is not handled 
   
   for e.g let's consider below CaseWhen Object
       val attrRef = AttributeReference("ACCESS_CHECK", StringType)()
       val caseWhenObj1 = CaseWhen(Seq((attrRef, Literal("A"))))
   
   caseWhenObj1.canonicalized **ouput** is as below
   
   CASE WHEN ACCESS_CHECK#0 THEN A END (**Before Fix)**
   
   **After Fix** : CASE WHEN none#0 THEN A END
   
   So when there will be aliasref like below statements, semantic equals will 
fail. Sematic equals returns true if the canonicalized form of both the 
expressions are same.
   
   val attrRef = AttributeReference("ACCESS_CHECK", StringType)()
   val aliasAttrRef = attrRef.withName("access_check")
   val caseWhenObj1 = CaseWhen(Seq((attrRef, Literal("A"))))
   val caseWhenObj2 = CaseWhen(Seq((aliasAttrRef, Literal("A"))))
   
   **assert(caseWhenObj2.semanticEquals(caseWhenObj1.semanticEquals) fails**
   
   **caseWhenObj1.canonicalized**                                  
   
   Before Fix:CASE WHEN ACCESS_CHECK#0 THEN A END
   After Fix: CASE WHEN none#0 THEN A END
   **caseWhenObj2.canonicalized**
       
   Before Fix:CASE WHEN access_check#0 THEN A END     
   After Fix: CASE WHEN none#0 THEN A END
   
   ## How was this patch tested?
   Added UT
   

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


With regards,
Apache Git Services

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to