Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3637#issuecomment-70029316
  
    @etrain  About abstracting the optimized transform() in 
LogisticRegressionModel: Here are a few possibilities.  What are your thoughts?
    * Goals:
      * Optimize transform: Make it fast, and make it output only the desired 
columns.
      * Easy development
      * Support Classifier, Regressor, and ProbabilisticClassifier
    * (currently) Developers implement predictX methods for each output column 
X.  They may override transform() to optimize speed.
      * Pros: predictX is easy to understand.
      * Cons: An optimized transform() is annoying to write.
    * Developers implement more basic transformation methods, such as 
features2raw, raw2pred, raw2prob.
      * Pros: Abstract classes may implement optimized transform().
      * Cons: Different types of predictors require different methods:
        * Predictor and Regressor: features2pred
        * Classifier: features2raw, raw2pred
        * ProbabilisticClassifier: raw2prob
    * Developers implement a single predict() method which takes parameters for 
what columns to output (returning tuple or some type with None for missing 
values).  Abstract classes take the outputs they want and put them into columns.
      * Pros: Developers only write 1 method and can optimize it as much as 
they want.  It could be more optimized than the previous 2 options; e.g., if 
LogisticRegressionModel only wants the prediction, then it never has to 
construct intermediate results such as the vector of raw predictions.
      * Cons: predict() will have a different signature for different 
abstractions, based on the possible output columns.
    
    @etrain  Enumeration for labels: It could be hard to do since Enumeration 
doesn’t cooperate with Java.  Also, ML attributes should be able to hold this 
metadata.  I like strong typing too...but it’s hard to make it work well for 
all the APIs.
    
    @tomerk  Parameterizing sharedParams to eliminate need for setters: This 
would make class declarations even longer, with the Estimator/Transformer type 
specified for every Param mixed in.  Also, there are some parameters which 
should not have setters; e.g., a LogisticRegressionModel should have a 
getRegParam() method, but it should not have a setRegParam() method.



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to