Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4206#issuecomment-71569793
Right, that was where we removed the train(long list of parameters)
methods. It's odd to keep it if we do not use it anywhere. On the other hand,
I like the idea of enforcing standardized String names for Losses. What about
adding a loss option to the GradientBoostedTreesRunner example? Does that seem
useful?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
