MaxGekk opened a new pull request #25958: [SPARK-29237][SQL][FOLLOWUP] Ignore `SET` commands in expression examples while checking the _FUNC_ pattern URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25958 ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? The `SET` commands do not contain the `_FUNC_` pattern a priori. In the PR, I propose filter out such commands in the `using _FUNC_ instead of function names in examples` test. ### Why are the changes needed? After the merge of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25942, examples will require particular settings. Currently, the whole expression example has to be ignored which is so much. It makes sense to ignore only `SET` commands in expression examples. ### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change? No ### How was this patch tested? By running the `using _FUNC_ instead of function names in examples` test.
---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] With regards, Apache Git Services --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
