sitegui opened a new pull request #26029: [SPARK-29336][SQL] Fix the 
implementation of QuantileSummaries.merge (guarantee that the relativeError 
will be respected)
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26029
 
 
   <!--
   Thanks for sending a pull request!  Here are some tips for you:
     1. If this is your first time, please read our contributor guidelines: 
https://spark.apache.org/contributing.html
     2. Ensure you have added or run the appropriate tests for your PR: 
https://spark.apache.org/developer-tools.html
     3. If the PR is unfinished, add '[WIP]' in your PR title, e.g., 
'[WIP][SPARK-XXXX] Your PR title ...'.
     4. Be sure to keep the PR description updated to reflect all changes.
     5. Please write your PR title to summarize what this PR proposes.
     6. If possible, provide a concise example to reproduce the issue for a 
faster review.
   -->
   
   ### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
   <!--
   Please clarify what changes you are proposing. The purpose of this section 
is to outline the changes and how this PR fixes the issue. 
   If possible, please consider writing useful notes for better and faster 
reviews in your PR. See the examples below.
     1. If you refactor some codes with changing classes, showing the class 
hierarchy will help reviewers.
     2. If you fix some SQL features, you can provide some references of other 
DBMSes.
     3. If there is design documentation, please add the link.
     4. If there is a discussion in the mailing list, please add the link.
   -->
   
   Reimplement `org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.util.QuantileSummaries#merge` and 
add a test-case showing the previous bug.
   
   ### Why are the changes needed?
   <!--
   Please clarify why the changes are needed. For instance,
     1. If you propose a new API, clarify the use case for a new API.
     2. If you fix a bug, you can clarify why it is a bug.
   -->
   
   The original Greenwald-Khanna paper, from which the algorithm behind 
`approxQuantile` was taken, does not cover how to merge the result of multiple 
parallel QuantileSummaries. The current implementation violates some invariants 
and therefore the effective error can be larger than the specified.
   
   ### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
   <!--
   If yes, please clarify the previous behavior and the change this PR proposes 
- provide the console output, description and/or an example to show the 
behavior difference if possible.
   If no, write 'No'.
   -->
   
   Yes, for same cases, the results from `approxQuantile` (`percentile_approx` 
in SQL) will now be within the expected error margin. For example:
   
   ```scala
   var values = (1 to 100).toArray
   val all_quantiles = values.indices.map(i => (i+1).toDouble / 
values.length).toArray
   for (n <- 0 until 5) {
     var df = spark.sparkContext.makeRDD(values).toDF("value").repartition(5)
     val all_answers = df.stat.approxQuantile("value", all_quantiles, 0.1)
     val all_answered_ranks = all_answers.map(ans => 
values.indexOf(ans)).toArray
     val error = all_answered_ranks.zipWithIndex.map({ case (answer, expected) 
=> Math.abs(expected - answer) }).toArray
     val max_error = error.max
     print(max_error + "\n")
   }
   ```
   
   In the current build it returns:
   
   ```
   16
   12
   10
   11
   17
   ```
   
   I couldn't run the code with this patch applied to double check the 
implementation. Can someone please confirm it now outputs at most `10`, please?
   
   ### How was this patch tested?
   <!--
   If tests were added, say they were added here. Please make sure to add some 
test cases that check the changes thoroughly including negative and positive 
cases if possible.
   If it was tested in a way different from regular unit tests, please clarify 
how you tested step by step, ideally copy and paste-able, so that other 
reviewers can test and check, and descendants can verify in the future.
   If tests were not added, please describe why they were not added and/or why 
it was difficult to add.
   -->
   
   A new unit test was added to uncover the previous bug.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


With regards,
Apache Git Services

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to