tgravescs opened a new pull request #26284: [SPARK-29415][Core]Stage Level 
Sched: Add base ResourceProfile and Request classes
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26284
 
 
   
   ### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
   
   This PR is adding the base classes needed for Stage level scheduling. Its 
adding a ResourceProfile and the executor and task resource request classes.  
These are made private for now until we get all the parts implemented, at which 
point this will become public interfaces.  I am adding them first as all the 
other subtasks for this feature require these classes.  If people have better 
ideas on breaking this feature up please let me know.
   
   See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-29415 for more detailed 
design.
   
   
   ### Why are the changes needed?
   <!--
   Please clarify why the changes are needed. For instance,
     1. If you propose a new API, clarify the use case for a new API.
     2. If you fix a bug, you can clarify why it is a bug.
   -->
   
   New API for stage level scheduling.  Its easier to add these first because 
the other jira for this features will all use them.
   
   ### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
   <!--
   If yes, please clarify the previous behavior and the change this PR proposes 
- provide the console output, description and/or an example to show the 
behavior difference if possible.
   If no, write 'No'.
   -->
   
   Yes adds API to create a ResourceProfile with executor/task resources, see 
the spip jira https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-27495
   
   Example of the api:
   val rp = new ResourceProfile()
   rp.require(new ExecutorResourceRequest("cores", 2))
   rp.require(new ExecutorResourceRequest("gpu", 1, 
Some("/opt/gpuScripts/getGpus")))
   rp.require(new TaskResourceRequest("gpu", 1))
   
   
   ### How was this patch tested?
   <!--
   If tests were added, say they were added here. Please make sure to add some 
test cases that check the changes thoroughly including negative and positive 
cases if possible.
   If it was tested in a way different from regular unit tests, please clarify 
how you tested step by step, ideally copy and paste-able, so that other 
reviewers can test and check, and descendants can verify in the future.
   If tests were not added, please describe why they were not added and/or why 
it was difficult to add.
   -->
   
   Tested using Unit tests added with this PR.
   

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


With regards,
Apache Git Services

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to