shivsood opened a new pull request #26549: [SPARK-29644][SQL][2.4] Corrected 
ShortType and ByteType mapping to SmallInt and TinyInt in JDBCUtils
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26549
 
 
   This is a port SPARK-29644 to 2.4
   
   What changes were proposed in this pull request?
   
   Corrected ShortType and ByteType mapping to SmallInt and TinyInt, corrected 
setter methods to set ShortType and ByteType as setShort() and setByte(). 
Changes in JDBCUtils.scala
   Fixed Unit test cases to where applicable and added new E2E test cases in to 
test table read/write using ShortType and ByteType.
   
   Problems
   - In master in JDBCUtils.scala line number 547 and 551 have a problem where 
ShortType and ByteType are set as Integers rather than set as Short and Byte 
respectively.
   
   ```
   case ShortType =>
       (stmt: PreparedStatement, row: Row, pos: Int) =>
       stmt.setInt(pos + 1, row.getShort(pos))
       The issue was pointed out by @maropu
   
   case ByteType =>
       (stmt: PreparedStatement, row: Row, pos: Int) =>
        stmt.setInt(pos + 1, row.getByte(pos))
   
   - Also at line JDBCUtils.scala 247 TinyInt is interpreted wrongly as 
IntergetType in getCatalystType()
   ``` case java.sql.Types.TINYINT => IntegerType ```
   
   - At line 172 ShortType was wrongly interpreted as IntegerType
   ``` case ShortType => Option(JdbcType("INTEGER", java.sql.Types.SMALLINT)) 
```
   
   - All thru out tests, ShortType and ByteType were being interpreted as 
IntegerTypes.
   
   Why are the changes needed?
   Given type should be set using the right type.
   
   Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
   No
   
   How was this patch tested?
   Corrected Unit test cases where applicable. Validated in CI/CD
   Added/fixed test case in MsSqlServerIntegrationSuite.scala, 
PostgresIntegrationSuite.scala , MySQLIntegrationSuite.scala to
   write/read tables from dataframe with cols as shorttype and bytetype. 
Validated by manual as follows.
   ./build/mvn install -DskipTests
   ./build/mvn test -Pdocker-integration-tests -pl 
:spark-docker-integration-tests_2.12
   
   <!--
   Thanks for sending a pull request!  Here are some tips for you:
     1. If this is your first time, please read our contributor guidelines: 
https://spark.apache.org/contributing.html
     2. Ensure you have added or run the appropriate tests for your PR: 
https://spark.apache.org/developer-tools.html
     3. If the PR is unfinished, add '[WIP]' in your PR title, e.g., 
'[WIP][SPARK-XXXX] Your PR title ...'.
     4. Be sure to keep the PR description updated to reflect all changes.
     5. Please write your PR title to summarize what this PR proposes.
     6. If possible, provide a concise example to reproduce the issue for a 
faster review.
   -->
   
   ### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
   <!--
   Please clarify what changes you are proposing. The purpose of this section 
is to outline the changes and how this PR fixes the issue. 
   If possible, please consider writing useful notes for better and faster 
reviews in your PR. See the examples below.
     1. If you refactor some codes with changing classes, showing the class 
hierarchy will help reviewers.
     2. If you fix some SQL features, you can provide some references of other 
DBMSes.
     3. If there is design documentation, please add the link.
     4. If there is a discussion in the mailing list, please add the link.
   -->
   
   
   ### Why are the changes needed?
   <!--
   Please clarify why the changes are needed. For instance,
     1. If you propose a new API, clarify the use case for a new API.
     2. If you fix a bug, you can clarify why it is a bug.
   -->
   
   
   ### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
   <!--
   If yes, please clarify the previous behavior and the change this PR proposes 
- provide the console output, description and/or an example to show the 
behavior difference if possible.
   If no, write 'No'.
   -->
   
   
   ### How was this patch tested?
   <!--
   If tests were added, say they were added here. Please make sure to add some 
test cases that check the changes thoroughly including negative and positive 
cases if possible.
   If it was tested in a way different from regular unit tests, please clarify 
how you tested step by step, ideally copy and paste-able, so that other 
reviewers can test and check, and descendants can verify in the future.
   If tests were not added, please describe why they were not added and/or why 
it was difficult to add.
   -->
   

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


With regards,
Apache Git Services

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to