HeartSaVioR commented on issue #26671: Revert "[SPARK-26081][SPARK-29999]" URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26671#issuecomment-558452333 Sorry I'm not clear on understanding the suggestion. Looks like you don't suggest to "do clean revert on both issues", but suggest to "do dirty revert on SPARK-26081 - revert SPARK-26081 and also the things depending on SPARK-26081 like body part of SPARK-29999", right? The way I understand the suggestion was former, as community has been preferred clean revert for most of cases. So I might want to confirm this again. And if we want to do the latter (clean revert on SPARK-26081 & partial revert on SPARK-29999), would we like to just mention the PR that the PR reverts SPARK-26081, or keep this as it is?
---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] With regards, Apache Git Services --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
