AngersZhuuuu commented on issue #26437: [SPARK-29800][SQL] Plan non-correlated 
Exists 's subquery in PlanSubqueries
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26437#issuecomment-558476143
 
 
   > For top-level limit, we use a special physical plan `CollectLimitExec`, 
which doesn't have a shuffle. The perf should be the same, but we can avoid 
adding a new physical node and planner change.
   
   Yea, I will try these way to see the change.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


With regards,
Apache Git Services

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to