manirajv06 commented on a change in pull request #356:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/incubator-yunikorn-core/pull/356#discussion_r781247167



##########
File path: pkg/scheduler/partition.go
##########
@@ -704,6 +704,28 @@ func (pc *PartitionContext) removeNodeAllocations(node 
*objects.Node) ([]*object
                                if alloc.NodeID != release.NodeID {
                                        // ignore the return as that is the 
same as alloc, the alloc is gone after this call
                                        _ = app.ReplaceAllocation(allocID)
+                                       // we need to check the resources 
equality
+                                       delta := 
resources.Sub(release.AllocatedResource, alloc.AllocatedResource)
+                                       // Any negative value in the delta 
means that at least one of the requested resource in the
+                                       // placeholder is larger than the real 
allocation. The nodes are correct the queue needs adjusting.
+                                       // The reverse case is handled during 
allocation.
+                                       if delta.HasNegativeValue() {
+                                               // this looks incorrect but the 
delta is negative and the result will be a real decrease
+                                               err := 
app.GetQueue().IncAllocatedResource(delta, false)

Review comment:
       Would this new queue adjustment cause any issues in conjunction with 
below adjustment in place? 
app.GetQueue().DecAllocatedResource(alloc.AllocatedResource)
   
   Can we double check? May be unit test to removeNode with replacement on 
different node ensures this?
   
   Other than this, overall changes looks good.




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Reply via email to