On Thu, 17 Jul 2003, Tom Diehl wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jul 2003, Lance Davis wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 17 Jul 2003, Michael Redinger wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Lance Davis wrote:
> > >
> > > > I have been working on similar for a little while, but based on building
> > > > on rh7.2, to avoid any possibility of license problems ...
> > >
> > > I don't think there are any licensing problems as long as you rebuild
> > > everything - including the installer.
> > > However, you must not redistribute it, it's only for your (your company's)
> > > use. See RHAT's "Trademark Guidelines and Policies":
> > > http://www.redhat.com/about/corporate/trademark/
> >
> > Surely as long as you conform to those guidelines, eg dont call it
> > 'Redhat' etc , and build everything from gpl source then there is no
> > problem.
>
> Does anyone happen to have a list of non-gpl packages?
Depends on what you mean with "non-GPL". I suppose you mean "commercial"
(not including other free licenses). Then it's only IBMJava2-(*JRE|SDK).
Quick check:
rpm -pq --queryformat '%{NAME}\t%{LICENSE}\n' *.rpm
--
Michael Redinger
Zentraler Informatikdienst (Computer Centre)
Universitaet Innsbruck
Technikerstrasse 13 Tel.: ++43 512 507 2335
6020 Innsbruck Fax.: ++43 512 507 2944
Austria Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rhel-rebuild mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hosted at the University of Innsbruck, Austria
