Hello...
On Tue, October 17, 2006 8:04 am, Jay Turner wrote: > On Tue, 2006-10-17 at 07:55 -0700, Christopher McCrory wrote: >> Hello... >> >> In my RHEL5 testing, I've noticed a lot of i386 packages are included >> with a x86_64 install. I know some are there for compatibility, but the >> number of packages seems like a build bug. I would open a bug, but I am >> not sure which component to use. >> >> Or is that "just how it is"? > > We vastly increased the number of 32-bit packages we're shipping as part > of the 64-bit distributions so I suspect this is "just how it is" now. > Please do report any which you feel are wrong and we'll certainly sort > that out. > >From a quick find through the tree (*) I would guess most packages that contain the same binaries; perl, subversion, etc. Probably most -devel.i386 packages; subversion-devel.i386 , mod_perl-devel.i386. device-mapper-1.02.09-1.0.RHEL5 ? why a 32 bit device mapper? (*) find Client/ Desktop/ Workstation/ | grep i386.rpm find Client/ Desktop/ Workstation/ | grep i386.rpm | grep devel > - jkt > > -- > --*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--* > Jay Turner, QE Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] Red Hat, > Inc. > > If A equals success, then the formula is: A = X + Y + Z, > X is work. Y is play. Z is keep your mouth shut. - Albert Einstein > _______________________________________________ > rhelv5-beta-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-beta-list > -- Christopher McCrory "The guy that keeps the servers running" [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pricegrabber.com Let's face it, there's no Hollow Earth, no robots, and no 'mute rays.' And even if there were, waxed paper is no defense. I tried it. Only tinfoil works. _______________________________________________ rhelv5-beta-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-beta-list
