On 12/21/06, Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 06:51:39AM -0500, Jay Turner wrote: > On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 23:13 -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On 12/20/06, Eli Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The real fix is to get the kernel source rpm and recompile the kernel > > > with a lower HZ value like 100 or 250. > > > > > > > Whee! Lovely.. well I was going to be throwing out any RH warranty anyway :). > > There was talk of either a sysctl or boot divisor to prevent people > having to recompile, but I can't seem to find any documentation in > support of that. Let me sweep up the floor and see if I can find those > bits :-)Changing a #define into a variable turns out to be a bad idea. For one, performance reasons, and secondly it multiplies the amount of QA work that needs to be done by however many options you offer. Dave
I can understand that.. so I am guessing a 'kernel-hz250-2.6.18-03.ELsmp' is also out of the question. Along with the kernel-rt and kernel-mm? [Ok ok so I have money on whether we can get Dave to eat his sock monkey before the end of the year. He has mental health coverage so they should be able to put him together again by FC7 release date.] -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- CSIRT/Linux System Administrator How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice" _______________________________________________ rhelv5-beta-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-beta-list
