Hi,
Looking at the files the RHEL5 pango and gtk2 packages include,
as well as the FC6 counterparts, I have the following observations:
- RHEL5 pango does include /etc/pango/i386-redhat-linux-gnu
^
- FC6 pango does include /etc/pango/i686-redhat-linux-gnu
^
- RHEL5 gtk2 does include /etc/gtk-2.0/i686-redhat-linux-gnu
- FC6 gtk2 does include /etc/gtk-2.0/i686-redhat-linux-gnu
Given the fact that all directories are directly related to %{_host}
(see the spec files), some questions pop up:
- Is RHEL5's pango indeed generated using an alternative %{_host}
definition? Why? Note that gtk2 has been generated differently.
- Is there a policy w.r.t. these directory names (and why is that
policy not the same for RHEL5 and FC6, why are the names different
for pango and gtk2)?
- Personally, I'd think that those directories should have the base
architecture name in it (i386-... in this case) i.s.o. the
specific architecture (i686-...) of the build host.
Can someone shed a light on this?
--
-- Jos Vos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-- X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV | Phone: +31 20 6938364
-- Amsterdam, The Netherlands | Fax: +31 20 6948204
_______________________________________________
rhelv5-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list
