On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 12:52:02PM +0100, Joe (Mobile) wrote: > and night trying to fix it, while the use of an uncertified system opens up > the > possibility of refusal of support and shoving the blame to us (meaning my team > and me). It might be possible that the use of e.g. CentOS due to its binary > compatibility to RHELcould be judged as valid by a court, but that would take > months, which is unacceptable in a restore scenario and not even guaranteered.
100% binary compatibility can *never* exist for whatever RHEL rebuild, so I presume you'll never win a court case without specific other evidence of the problem. In reality, the chance that a RHEL rebuild is causing an incompatibility problem is very small, but it's my experience that big companies will always try to blame you and/or the rebuild OS, unless proven otherwise. -- -- Jos Vos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV | Phone: +31 20 6938364 -- Amsterdam, The Netherlands | Fax: +31 20 6948204 _______________________________________________ rhelv5-list mailing list rhelv5-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list
