eth0 and eth1 both have ONBOOT=yes I am not fluent in reading dmesg, but it smells OK to me with the following snips: Bill Watson - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e1000: eth0: e1000_probe: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection GSI 22 sharing vector 0x72 and IRQ 22 ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:05:00.1[B] -> GSI 19 (level, low) -> IRQ 114 PCI: Setting latency timer of device 0000:05:00.1 to 64 e1000: 0000:05:00.1: e1000_probe: (PCI Express:2.5Gb/s:32-bit) 00:15:17:30:2b:39 sd 0:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg0 type 0 e1000: eth1: e1000_probe: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection sd 0:0:0:1: Attached scsi generic sg1 type 0 scsi 1:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg2 type 1 shpchp: Standard Hot Plug PCI Controller Driver version: 0.4 <snip> NET: Registered protocol family 10 lo: Disabled Privacy Extensions IPv6 over IPv4 tunneling driver -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alasdair Gow Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2007 8:22 AM To: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 (Tikanga) discussion mailing-list Subject: Re: [rhelv5-list] Tale of 2 nic cards Have a look in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ ifcfg-eth0 ifcfg-eth1 etc.... onboot will either equal yes or no. make sure both are yes........ if it still doesn't work have a look in dmesg for anything interesting. Alasdair Bill Watson wrote: > I have an intel S5000Psl motherboard with 2 nic cards. Using the GUI > console, I set one to be IP4 and not IP6 fully configured with > gateway, dns, hostname, etc. I set the other on my LAN (tried with and > without a gateway > defined) no dns, etc. I also tried the 2nd as fully configured (not IP6) as > I could. On both nic cards, I select start on boot. The symptoms remain > consistent. > > While the system is up, I can activate both lans and they both work > beautifully. When I reboot, only one activates, the other says > inactive. I can hand activate and life is again good. > > The net icon in the upper right corner will only allow one network to > be selected at a time. I'm not sure what's up with that, or why an > network chooser icon is thought to be so needed as to be default > placed on the desktop. (my ignorance showing) > > Is there a clean way to have both networks launch on bootup? > > Thanks in advance! > Bill Watson > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _______________________________________________ > rhelv5-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list > -- Alasdair Gow Lumison t: 0845 1199 900 d: 0131 514 4042 PS. Do you know that we have opened a new datacentre in Croydon? Click https://www.lumison.net/services/pdfs/colo_croydon.pdf or give us a call 0845 119 2030 if you want to know more. -- This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender. Any offers or quotation of service are subject to formal specification. Errors and omissions excepted. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Lumison, nplusone or lightershade ltd. Finally, the recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. Lumison, nplusone and lightershade ltd accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. _______________________________________________ rhelv5-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list _______________________________________________ rhelv5-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list
