Kenneth Holter wrote:
Hi.
We have some very stable RHEL 5.1 servers that we need to update. If we are
to apply all available patches the version number increments to 5.2. What is
best practice in such situations - does one apply all available patches, or
select patches relevant for 5.1 only (thus keeping version number 5.1)? As
our servers are very stable, I don't see the need for any patches that are
not security or bug fix related. In other words, we are not in need of any
new features.
We're using Satellite Server 5.0.1 at the moment, and as far as I know these
is no options enforcing version number to stay 5.1. But in Satellite server
5.1 this feature is implemented. So basically, we're wondering if the best
thing would be to upgrade to Satellite server 5.1 and use the above
mentioned feature to ensure that our servers remain at RHEL 5.1.
Any input on this are appreciated.
Whatever procedure _you_ adopt should be illuminated by your proceudures
for testing initial releases (eg 5.0) and individual updates.
I would think a middle course; you know the overall capabilities of
RHEL5 and the extent to which it suits you.
In your shoes, I would look at relevant changes and decide their
desirability. Assuming the recommendation is to install it on new
systems, then the previous test plan needs to be revisited and updated
to take account of experience (bugs) and new/changed features.
At that time you should be able to develop your plan to upgrade existing
systems.
--
Cheers
John
-- spambait
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Advice
http://webfoot.com/advice/email.top.php
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375
You cannot reply off-list:-)
_______________________________________________
rhelv5-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list
