On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 07:16:12PM +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote: > what is wrong with the CentOS policy ? > > I dont see any harm in removing from the main repo's kernels which are > now known to have issues and exploits. Besides, we still maintain the > full compliment of all kernels and updates released within the point > release, as well the centosplus kernels and updated fixed kernels for > issues that people are facing at the moment.
It's not about kernels only, it's about all packages. IMHO all packages that are ever released for a certain OS version (say CentOS 5) should stay online (with the corresponding src.rpm's) for support reasons. This is not related to the package's quality or the fact that nobody should run those old packages. Now, AFAICS now this is done at vault.centos.org, so it's not that bad, but it would be better if it was just in the main tree, kept on all mirrors. Having said this, I agree that the amount of data grows quite fast and that mirrors might not want to carry it all, data that is mostly there for reference and won't be downloaded very often. -- -- Jos Vos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV | Phone: +31 20 6938364 -- Amsterdam, The Netherlands | Fax: +31 20 6948204 _______________________________________________ rhelv5-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list
