On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 11:02 AM, David Rees wrote: > On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 7:32 AM, Axel Thimm wrote: >> I start to think whether these kernels are indeed being all used to >> the extend of justifying full kmdl support. Maybe it would make sense >> to keep the full last series (2.6.18-92* above) and the highest one >> from the series before (2.6.18-53.1.21.el5 and 2.6.18-8.1.15.el5). > > Eek, that's a lot of rebuilds. Yes, I think your suggested policy > sounds fine to me as generally it's a good idea to keep on the latest > kernel as usually they are either bugfix or security fix updates.
Ideally yes, but of course there are sometimes problems with a new kernel which forces users to use the previous one (or an even older one in really bad cases. However, I think for the purposes of ATrpms keeping only the latest is reasonable. The SRPMs are available if needed. _______________________________________________ rhelv5-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list
