On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Andrew Bacchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This kind of question always brings out a wide spectrum of replies. I > absolutely hate upgrades. I'm just now getting around to upping from AS 3 > to AS 4. 18 months is too short a time period between upgrades, I'd rather > see 60 months, but that's just my selfish wish. >
Hehe.. I have software running on 2.1 that the upstream vendor has just gotten plans to update to EL-3. However, I also have some colleges that didn't like our Linux lab because it didn't get updated every 6 months to the latest fedora. > I'm charged with building software for the many versions of RH I have on > campus. I even have to rebuild some software to accommodate minor kernel > upgrades. It's not an easy task, and it's very difficult to keep up with > it. A slower pace would be my preference. > Well you don't have to upgrade to X+1 you know :).. At 60 months, most of your software would be running RHEL-2. -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- BSD/GNU/Linux How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice" _______________________________________________ rhelv5-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list
