On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 09:23 -0700, MJang wrote: [snip]
>
> "It was also guessed that Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 might not come out
> for some time and that it would definitely not be based on Fedora 9...
> but probably Fedora 11, 12 or even 13."
I used to love the old days of schedule speculation. But even more than
that were the old days of having to inform the backbone maintainers
before we released so they could be "prepared."
Anyway, I would like to take this opportunity to offer a side trip with
this thread. What do people need/want in RHEL6?
On the topic of not liking upgrades because software vendors aren't
keeping up, that's one of the huge advantages of our virt story. It
allows you the opportunity to utilize the latest hardware, but lay an
older release on top and (hopefully!) minimize the impact. We've even
done some testing in-house with the para-virt drivers which resulted in
higher performance on the virt guest than when the same OS was laid down
on bare metal.
- jkt
--
--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*
Jay Turner, Director, QE [EMAIL PROTECTED] Red Hat, Inc.
If A equals success, then the formula is: A = X + Y + Z,
X is work. Y is play. Z is keep your mouth shut. - Albert Einstein
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ rhelv5-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list
