On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 08:25 -0400, Brian Long wrote: > I believe what the OP is saying is that he would like two default > routes. If traffic comes into eth0 from a non-local subnet, he'd like > the replies to go out eth0. If traffic comes into eth2 from a > non-local subnet, he'd like the replies to go out eth2.
I actually thought that was what he was asking for as well, and I was going to post links about policy based routing, but then he posted a "what we expect to see" routing table that really didn't seem to match that statement. Based on the routing table that he showed it seemed that he just wanted eth0 to be the default route and eth2 to talk to devices only on it's connected subnet. > If his network contains hundreds of subnets and he's situated this > host somewhere in the middle, setting hundreds of static routes for > eth0 and hundreds for eth2 is not a manageable solution. Unfortunately he didn't mention his subnet layout, only his goal of "packets coming in on an interface going out of the same interface" which leaves a lot to interpretation. Later, Tom _______________________________________________ rhelv5-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list
