On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 14:45 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have a DNS server that I am trying to retire. As you may or may not > know you should always use a A name record, which is also a PTR > record. > The requirement: > A system must respond on 120.207.9.13 with DNS queries and it must > also respond to 120.207.12.22 its eventual new name. The system name > is server12.cc.gatech.edu on 120.207.12.22 and server9.cc.gatech.edu > on 120.207.9.13. The subnet mask is 255.255.255.0 the gateways are > for server 9 120.207.9.1 and for server12 is 120.207.12.1. Recapping: > Eth0 120.207.12.22 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 120.207.12.1 > server12.cc.gatech.edu > Eth2 120.207.9.13 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 120.207.9.1 > server9.cc.gatech.edu
Are these the actual IP addresses that you need? They are quite different from the ones in your original post (your first message used 120.207.7.245 and 120.207.17.22). It's difficult to help which you keep changing the information. > I ping or nslookup toserver9.cc.gatech.edu and I get server9 > responding if I ping or nslookup to server12.cc.gatech.edu I get > server12 responding anywhere on my network. > Hope this is clear. This works like a charm on Solaris. How do I do > this on Linux? I'm not sure how Solaris handles having multiple default routes on two different interfaces. Perhaps it responds using the default route of the interface on which the traffic came in on, or at least based on the source IP address. Even so, it should be possible to get the same behavior from Linux, however, we need good information. Ideally please post the ifcfg-eth* files as well as any route-eth* files from /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts. Also, the output of /etc/sysconfig/network might be interesting. And finally your current "netstat -rn" output from the system with which you actually need help. Later, Tom _______________________________________________ rhelv5-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list
