that makes me wonder about something I have several computers with 4GB of
ram using the regular 32 bit kernel (non-PAE) and I see different amounts of
ram, for instance:
]# free -m
total
Mem: 3286
]# free -m
total
Mem: 3986
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 1:45 PM, Bill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have inflated a 64 bit server a couple times and Mozilla Firefox that
> comes as the
> default console web browser does not support flash. Should I get RedHat to
> fix it
> since they supplied it, or the flash folks (Apple?), or Mozilla, or ???? I
> gave up and
> re-installed with the 32 bit kernel. While frustrated, I'm too small to
> fight these
> guys.
>
> Bill Watson
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ---------- Original Message -----------
> From: John Haxby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 (Tikanga) discussion mailing-list" <rhelv5-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 12:41:54 +0100
> Subject: Re: [rhelv5-list] PAE Kernel 32 bit RHEL 5.2 64GB RAM
>
> > Nick Lunt wrote:
> > >
> > > [WINDOWS-1252?]We've got a RHEL 5.2 32 bit server with 64GB of RAM.
> We had to use
> 32
> > > bit Redhat due to the application.
> > >
> >
> > Because the application doesn't work or isn't supported? If the former,
> > I would be quite surprised if it could not be convinced to work; if the
> > latter you need to get on to the supplier to get them to certify on
> x86_64.
> >
> > jch
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rhelv5-list mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list
> ------- End of Original Message -------
>
> _______________________________________________
> rhelv5-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list
>
_______________________________________________
rhelv5-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list
