Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
On 2008-10-01, John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't see why you would want both a local group specification, and
then membership defined group wide in LDAP. And wouldn't those cancel
each other out ?
If the network (or LDAP server) is down?
We do run multiple LDAP masters, and the accounts/groups in LDAP are
for human-accounts and human-groups, so it shouldn't cause any big
interuptions if network/ldap is temporarily down. But yes, without
network, network services woun't work :-)
Good.
Now we're agreed, Simon is equipped to decide whether his sites needs
local users and groups:)))
--
Cheers
John
-- spambait
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Advice
http://webfoot.com/advice/email.top.php
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375
You cannot reply off-list:-)
_______________________________________________
rhelv5-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list
