Dag Wieers wrote: > I don't think it can be resolved without a commitment from both parties. > > And since the Fedora project decided to do EPEL at a time when it was easy > to resolve, I don't think there is any hope to have a commitment to > resolve it in the future. > > But you know how it is in Open Source, it is easier to start something new > and control it, then to have to agree with an existing party first. Fact > is that you now have (at least) two communities instead of one around > extra packages for RHEL/CentOS and I can only blame the Fedora project > (twice) for this. > > I guess I should have applied for a job at Red Hat to be listened to ? > Thanks for clearing that up. It's a shame that your (much appreciated) efforts can't be pooled as it really cuts down the number of packages available in RHEL, which is already at a level much lower than most other distros. Still I suppose I can keep both configured and just enable them carefully when needed.
Tim Edwards _______________________________________________ rhelv5-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list
